Hoka Clifton vs Brooks Ghost: Clifton 9 and Ghost 15 Running Shoes
Last Updated: March 12, 2024 | Author: Jake Thompson
When comparing Brooks and Hoka, it's a battle between two giants in the running world. Brooks running shoes are well-loved for their durability and support, making them a solid choice for runners.
Hokas running shoes, on the other hand, are famous for their exceptional cushioning, offering a softer ride. The Brooks Ghost is a stability shoe designed for a smoother run. While the Hoka Clifton similar to the Hoka Bondi, is a cushioned shoe that snugs the entire foot without compromising comfort.
Let us dive into a deeper comparison of Hoka Clifton vs Brooks Ghost to help you decide which one is best.
Table of Content:
- Key Takeaways
- Table: Hoka Clifton vs Brooks Ghost
- Pros & Cons
- Design and Construction
- Performance Comparison
- Comfort and Cushioning
- Stability and Responsiveness
- Durability Features
- Final Verdict
- Frequently Asked Questions
Key Takeaways
- The Hoka Clifton 9 is super comfy and responsive. It has a 5 mm drop for a natural foot strike.
- The Brooks Ghost 15 is all about stability and comfort. It has a 12 mm drop for traditional support.
- Both shoes are great for long distances and are durable.
- If you like a responsive feel, go for the Clifton. If you prefer stability, go for the Ghost. It's all about what you like best!
Table: Hoka Clifton vs Brooks Ghost
Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Brooks Ghost 15 |
---|---|---|
Terrain | Road | Road |
Pace | Daily Running | Daily Running |
Toebox | Medium | Medium |
Pronation | Underpronation, Supination, Neutral Pronation | Underpronation, Supination, Neutral Pronation |
Arch Support | Neutral | Neutral |
Heel-to-Toe Drop | 5mm | 12mm |
Weight | 249g | 286g |
Cushioning | Balanced | Plush |
Breathable | ✓ | ✓ |
Comfortable | ✓ | ✓ |
Lightweight | ✓ | - |
Maximalist | ✓ | ✓ |
Orthotic Friendly | ✓ | ✓ |
Removable Insole | ✓ | ✓ |
Rocker | ✓ | - |
Sockless Wear | ✓ | ✓ |
Distance | Long Distance | Long Distance |
Widths Available | Normal, Wide, Narrow | Normal, Wide, X-Wide |
All-day Wear | ✓ | ✓ |
For Beginners | ✓ | ✓ |
Jogging | ✓ | ✓ |
Treadmill | - | ✓ |
Walking | ✓ | ✓ |
Strike Pattern | Forefoot/Midfoot Strike | Heel Strike |
Arch Type | High Arch | High Arch |
Flexibility | Moderate | Flexible |
Material | Knit | Mesh |
Season | Winter | Summer |
Release Date | Feb 15, 2023 | Nov 2022 |
of Colorways | 54 | 101 |
Forefoot Height | 27mm | 23mm |
Heel Height | 32mm | 35mm |
Price |
Pros & Cons
Hoka Clifton
Pros:- - Lightweight design enhances running efficiency.
- - Thick cushioning provides excellent shock absorption.
- - A wide base offers increased stability.
- - Some runners find the thick sole lacks responsiveness.
- - Higher price point than some competitors.
Brooks Ghost
Pros:- - Balanced cushioning offers a comfortable, responsive ride.
- - Durable outsole suitable for long mileage.
- - Versatile for different types of running and surfaces.
- True to size
- - Some users report a snug fit, which may not suit wider feet.
- - Cushioning may feel too soft for runners preferring firmer support.
Design and Construction
The Hoka Clifton and Brooks Ghost are designed with different materials and made to improve how they feel and perform. The Clifton 9 has a thick layer of EVA foam that makes it cushioned and smooth to run in. It also has a special shape called the Meta-Rocker Geometry, which helps your feet move more easily.
The Brooks Ghost 15 has a slightly thinner layer of cushioning called DNA LOFT v2. This cushioning is soft and durable, perfect for long runs. Both shoes are made to be comfortable but in different ways. The Clifton has a lower drop of 5 mm while the Ghost has a traditional drop of 12 mm, which affects how your feet move when you run.
Besides comfort, the Brooks Ghost 15 is also focused on being environmentally friendly. They've worked to make the shoe carbon-neutral, which is a big deal for people who care about the environment.
Performance Comparison
When comparing the performance of the Clifton 9 to the Ghost 15, you'll notice huge differences. Each shoe offers a distinct blend of comfort, stability, and responsiveness. These are critical factors for runners preferring long-distance support. Delving into the specifics, and considering the metrics that define their performance on the road is crucial.
Aspect | Clifton 9 | Ghost 15 |
---|---|---|
Comfort | High | High |
Stability | Moderate | High |
Responsiveness | High | Moderate |
Weight | Lighter | Heavier |
Price |
The table above distills the core comparison metrics between the two.
The Hoka Clifton shines in responsiveness. This is due to its lower drop and lighter weight, making it a good choice for runners seeking a lively ride.
Conversely, the Brooks Ghost 15 offers enhanced stability. I attribute this to its higher drop and slightly heavier build, providing a secure and grounded feel during runs.
Finally, the choice between both shoes boils down to preferring responsiveness or stability. Both shoes offer commendable comfort, but the nuances in their design cater to slightly different runner preferences.
Comfort and Cushioning
Let's now see how the comfort and cushioning technologies of the Hoka vs Brooks impact long-distance running. These features greatly affect running comfort over long distances.
The Clifton 9 has a 32 mm stack height and compression-molded EVA foam. It provides additional cushioning that reduces joint impact on long runs. Its 5 mm drop promotes a natural foot strike. This, along with its lightweight design, makes it feel like running on clouds while remaining durable.
The Brooks Ghost 15 has a 35 mm stack height and DNA LOFT v2 cushioning. It delivers a plush and responsive ride, absorbing shock efficiently. Its 12 mm drop offers a traditional feel, favored by some runners for added support, especially on longer runs. Despite being slightly heavier, it's still durable, maintaining comfort and support over time.
Both shoes excel in providing comfort and cushioning technologies. These features significantly impact long-distance running. Their unique approaches to support and durability cater to different runner preferences.
Stability and Responsiveness
Exploring stability and responsiveness is crucial. Understanding how the Hoka and Brooks incorporate specific features is essential. These elements directly impact a runner's performance and safety during runs.
The Clifton has a lower 5 mm drop. It encourages a more natural foot strike. This can increase stability for some runners. It promotes a balanced and efficient running form.
In contrast, the Brooks Ghost 15 has a classic 12 mm drop. It offers a different kind of stability. Some runners might find it more supportive. Especially those used to traditional running shoe feel.
When it comes to responsiveness, the materials used in both shoes play a critical role. The Hoka uses compression-molded EVA foam. It offers a soft yet responsive ride. This allows for quick and agile movements.
The Brooks Ghost utilizes Biomogo DNA LOFT v2 technology. It promises a responsive yet cushioned experience. It adapts to each step and movement.
Responsiveness is crucial during runs. It impacts how effectively a runner can adapt. It's essential for changes in pace and terrain.
Durability Features
Understanding stability and responsiveness is crucial. They influence a runner's performance and safety. This sets the stage to explore specific features. These features enhance the durability of both running shoes.
When it comes to outsole materials, both shoes boast high-quality rubber that's strategically placed in high-wear areas. This guarantees they can withstand the rigors of daily training without sacrificing grip or traction.
However, the Hoka takes a slightly different approach with its reinforced areas. Hoka uses extra rubber reinforcements. They're along its outsole and midsole. They aim to reduce wear and tear.
They also extend the shoe's life. This is especially beneficial for heavier runners or those with a more abrasive stride.
The Brooks Ghost 15 has protective overlays. They're around the upper part of the shoe. These overlays guard against fabric wear.
Both running shoes have specific features. They're designed to increase durability. These features include outsole materials. They also include reinforced areas and protective overlays.
Each has its strategy to guarantee longevity, making them reliable choices for avid runners.
Final Verdict
When you look at Hoka Clifton vs Brooks Ghost, it's like choosing between two great friends in the long run. If you like your shoes to feel super soft and quick, Hoka is the way to go. It makes running feel like bouncing on clouds because it's light and has a special shape to help you move smoothly.
But, if you want your shoes to feel steady and care about the earth, Brooks Ghost 15 is your buddy. It's a bit heavier but helps your feet feel super secure and is made in a way that's better for the planet. Both shoes are awesome for long runs and will last a long time.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What's the main difference between Clifton and Brooks Ghost running shoes?
The main difference lies in their cushioning and design philosophy. Hoka shoes are known for their maximal cushioning. They use a unique rocker design. This design promotes smooth quicker transitions.
It also reduces stress on the foot. Brooks Ghost offers balanced, responsive cushioning with DNA Loft foam for a plush feel underfoot. Both Hoka and Brooks are great for running.
Hoka is preferred for its thick cushioning. Brooks is favored for its highly balanced comfort.
2. Are Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 15 good for long-distance running?
Yes, both shoes are excellent for long-distance running. Clifton's maximal cushioning and early-stage Meta-Rocker design help reduce fatigue over miles. They're a great choice for marathon runners.
Brooks Ghost, with its DNA Loft foam, ensures soft cushioning and smooth transitions. It's suitable for high mileage. Plus, it maintains durability and comfort. Both shoes are designed to keep your feet comfortable over long distances.
3. Which shoe is better for beginners, Hoka or Brooks?
Both two shoes are excellent for beginners due to their cushioning and support. Clifton offers thick, soft cushioning. It also has a rocker design.
This eases the transition from heel to toe. It's a great choice for those new to running. Especially if they're looking for maximum shock absorption.
Brooks Ghost provides a more balanced, versatile cushioning with smoother transitions, making it suitable for various types of runs. Your choice should depend on your preference for cushioning firmness and support.
4. Which midsole, Hoka or Brooks Ghost, offers better comfort for runners with bunions?
For runners with bunions, the wider toe box in Hoka shoes like the Clifton accommodates comfortably, offering relief. Its ample space minimizes pressure on the toes. Brooks Ghost also provides a roomy toe box, but some find Hoka's design more accommodating. Considering the bunions, Hoka's wider toe box may provide better comfort. However, personal preference and individual fit can vary, so trying both brand's may be beneficial.
5. Which between Hoka One One and Brooks models is the top choice for runners seeking the best performance?
In terms of performance, both Hoka One One and Brooks offer exceptional options. Hoka's emphasis on energy return, with its proprietary technology, appeals to many athletes seeking a responsive ride. Meanwhile, Brooks shoes, known for their reliable cushioning and stability features like Guiderails, cater well to performance-oriented runners. The choice between the two ultimately depends on individual gait, preference for energy return versus stability, and specific needs for performance enhancement.
Share this: